Teachers & homeschoolers
K–12 assessment review
Find the mistakes
before your
learners do
Upload a worksheet, quiz or workbook Steletta brings together multiple AI agents to check answers, question quality and coverage of your learning goals
You get a clear verdict and specific fixes to review before you teach, share or sell it
Peace of mind, without hours of rechecking
Teachers & homeschoolers: Can I give this AI worksheet to my students?
Catch every mistake in one click
Multiple agents. Multiple passes. Confidence in your material
Grade 6 math review24 questions
Needs fixes
Overall scores reflect the full material; fix 2 required issues before use
Accuracy and quality
72/100Coverage
92/100Required fixes2
- Question 2
B and D both meet the condition
Evidence
Every square and every rhombus has four equal sides, so the single-answer question has two valid choices
Suggested fix
Ask “Which shape always has four equal sides and four right angles?” so only Square is correct
- Question 6
The key is right, but the rule is false
Evidence
Zero is a counterexample: its absolute value is zero, which is not positive
Suggested fix
Explain absolute value as distance from zero, which is always nonnegative
Suggestions3
- Question 4
Two equivalent choices can be ruled out
Evidence
4/6 and 2/3 are equal. Because only one answer can be correct, learners can eliminate both without knowing the answer
Suggested fix
Replace one duplicate with a distinct wrong value, such as 3/8, so each choice tests a different misconception
- Answer key · Questions 9–16
Eight consecutive answers are B
Evidence
Questions 9–16 in this 24-question set all key B. This long run can become a guessing cue even when individual questions look fine
Suggested fix
Vary the position of correct choices, then recheck the key
- Question 7
The answer repeats the question
Evidence
“Proportional” in the stem points straight to “proportionally” without checking whether the learner understands the relationship
Suggested fix
Replace B with “Their ratio stays constant” to test the concept
What works well1
- Across the material
The core skills receive balanced practice
Evidence
Fractions, proportional relationships and signed numbers each receive practice, with a mix of calculation and reasoning questions
Suggested fix
Keep this spread of skills and question types when revising the set
Why not just ask ChatGPT?
| StelettaBuilt-in review process | |
|---|---|
| One request for a complete reviewOne complete report without repeated review prompts | ✓ |
| A consistent process at any document lengthThe same defined checks for a short quiz or a full workbook | ✓ |
| Two scores calculated by fixed rulesAccuracy and quality, then coverage, scored separately from the review evidence | ✓ |
| Multiple models, separate review stepsDifferent models find and verify issues, so one model isn’t checking its own work | ✓ |
| A defined stopping pointFollow-up checks without repeatedly asking “anything else?” | ✓ |
| Every question accounted forLong documents split into small blocks with a record of what was checked | ✓ |
| Coverage matched to the learning goalChecks for missing topics, grade fit and enough practice | ✓ |
| Dedicated checks for weak answer choicesEquivalent distractors, multiple correct answers and giveaway patterns | ✓ |
Your material stays yours.
Always
We automatically delete the uploaded copy after your review
Read our privacy policyMarketplaces · Publishers · Tutoring centres · Education teamsNeed to review
Need to review
large amounts of material?
Review large batches of resources in one go through the API.
We can help with the integration